Skip to main content

Friday, November 6, 2026

Indegene to Pay Up to $4,717,250 Over Junk Faxes in TCPA Settlement

Indegene, Inc. has agreed to pay up to $4,717,250 to settle a TCPA class action over marketing faxes sent without proper consent. Separately, a California federal court granted default judgment in a TCPA case despite open questions about the facts, and TCPAWorld lays out what Democrats sweeping to power could mean for the statute.

1Lookup Signal Report

58.8% of phone checks came back mobile today, down sharply from the weekly average

Across 2,810 checks run on the 1Lookup platform on 2026-11-06, 58.8% came back mobile, down 37.7 points from the trailing seven-day average of 96.5%. Landline checks rose to 22.9%, up 20.2 points from baseline. Active phone status ran at 74.7%, down 20.5 points from the 95.2% weekly average, while unclassified status jumped to 12.2%, up 12.1 points. Email deliverability held at 93.0% across 3,619 checks, with 4.0% undeliverable.

Phone line types

2,810 checks

  • mobile58.8%
  • landline22.9%
  • other line types18.3%

Phone number status

2,810 checks

  • active74.7%
  • unclassified12.2%
  • other line types13.1%

Email deliverability

3,619 checks

  • deliverable93%
  • undeliverable4%
  • risky1.9%
  • other line types1.1%

Every completed lookup on 1Lookup this UTC day.

  1. 01

    Indegene, Inc. to pay up to $4,717,250 to settle junk fax TCPA class action

    Indegene, Inc. has agreed to pay up to $4,717,250 to resolve a TCPA class action over marketing faxes sent without the proper level of consent. Faxes remain a significant marketing channel in health and pharmaceutical industries, and this case addresses unconsented fax marketing in that space.

    Why it matters: Any business still using fax for marketing or outreach needs documented consent before sending. This settlement shows the cost of skipping that step, even in an industry where fax is still common practice.

  2. 02

    California federal court grants default judgment on TCPA claim despite factual uncertainty

    In Gray v. Buzzmarketing, LLC, 2026 WL 3341179 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 3, 2026), a California federal court granted default judgment on a TCPA claim after the defendant failed to appear, even though it was not clear whether a genuine factual dispute existed. Some judges scrutinize the merits of a plaintiff's claims despite a defendant's absence, but Buzzmarketing did not get that benefit.

    Why it matters: Failing to respond to a TCPA suit does not guarantee a court will dig into whether the claim holds up. Businesses that get served need to show up and contest the facts, not assume silence is a safe option.

  3. 03

    TCPAWorld outlines what Democrats sweeping to power could mean for the TCPA

    TCPAWorld published its take on what Democrats sweeping to power may mean for the TCPA, following questions the outlet has fielded about the election's effect on the statute.

    Why it matters: Political shifts can change how aggressively TCPA rules get enforced or expanded. Businesses that call, text or email prospects should watch for signals on enforcement priorities as the balance of power shifts.

Questions people asked today

How much is Indegene paying to settle the junk fax TCPA case?
Indegene, Inc. has agreed to pay up to $4,717,250 to settle a TCPA class action over marketing faxes sent without proper consent.
What happened in the California default judgment TCPA case?
In Gray v. Buzzmarketing, LLC, a California federal court granted default judgment on a TCPA claim on November 3, 2026, even though it was unclear whether a genuine factual dispute existed, after the defendant failed to appear.
What percentage of phone numbers checked today came back mobile?
Across 2,810 checks run on the 1Lookup platform on 2026-11-06, 58.8% came back mobile, down 37.7 points from the trailing seven-day average of 96.5%.

Check your own numbers against this

Why are my calls showing as spam likely? · What share of phone numbers are VOIP? · How many numbers are invalid or disconnected?